Meeting (2019-01-17) - PIs Meeting


 

 

Meeting Time:       17 January 2019, 11:00 - 1:30 (Eastern)

Meeting Location: DAHC (Digital Arts & Humanities Commons) (directions)

U. Miami Agenda

 


Purpose of today's meeting

 

 

1. Review budget, spending, personnel, and grant administration issues  

 

 

 

 

2. Consult on project roadmap for rest of academic year 2018-2019

  1. Ongoing tasks with end-of-academic year deadlines
    1. Standing teams (collection, interpretation, and methods development work)
      1. Primary Corpus Collection & Analysis Team (led by Lindsay Thomas)
      2. Students and the Humanities Team (led by Abigail Droge)
      3. Diverse Populations Team (led by Giorgina Paiella)
      4. Interpretation Lab Team (led by Dan Baciu)
        1. Interpretation Protocol development
        2. Data Visualization 
        3. Word Embedding
    2. Collection of materials (Possible all-hands meeting in Feb. or Mar. to set goals for collection by end of year?)
      1. "Complete" U.S. collection by June?
        1. Current collection tally 
      2. "Random" corpus collection at U.M.
      3. Subcorpora:
        1. student-related material
        2. social media material
        3. "diverse populations" material
        4. Spanish-language corpus 
  2. Development of Interpretation Protocol 
    1. January preparatory tasks: Preparatory tasks to improve topic modeling interpretation (see below for details)
    2. February and March: next series of topic model interpretation workshops.
      1. When to schedule the all-hands workshops
    3. April, May, and June: "Real" interpretation of our corpus (including subcorpora) to address one to three specific research question--e.g.,
      • What is the similarity/difference between mainstream news media and student discourse on the humanities? (Or a comparison between our main corpus and any subcorpus)
      • How do the humanities and sciences compare in news media?
      • How does the "cosmic background radiation" of the humanities compare in the U.S. West vs. East vs. Midwest, vs. South?
      • How does our corpus compare to a "random" corpus? 
  3. Human Subjects Research
    1. Proposal by Abigail:
      1. (see Abigail's post in Ryver) 
    2. Next steps:
      1. We put together a basic outline of what research we want to do that involves human research (the essential idea, but with enough detail to give a sense of the scope, length, and goal of the effort)
      2. Alan asks the Mellon what would be needed in the way of approval from them to add this to our methods, and if approval is needed whether we would need to put in a formal proposal. Alan's reading of their document on grant modifications leads him to guess that so long as our research effort in this new direction is relatively small, and so long as we are not reallocating funds from one category such as RA salaries to a new category, then we probably won’t be asked to go through their formal grant modification request process (which seems to be mostly about extending the period or redirecting the use of funds).
  4. Goal by end of academic year: position ourselves to address further research questions and embark on analytical and reporting work on our corpus.
    1. Project "triage" at end of second year 

 

 

 

2. Technical Development

 

 

 

3. Summer research camp 2019 (July 1-Aug 2) 

 

 

 

 

4. All-hands Meeting Dates

 

 

 

 

5.

 

 

 

 

 

Planning for Future Meetings